Market Ticker Forums
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
Rss Icon RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Sponsored Advertising
To remove advertising from your display upgrade to Gold Donor status
MarketTicker Forums Read Message in SoftCommodities
User: Not logged on
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout
User Info Water uncertainty frustrates busy Calif. farmers in forum [SoftCommodities]
Lplate
Posts: 4737
Incept: 2008-08-06
Gold
Australia
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List Ignore this thread
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/arti....
Quote:
Water uncertainty frustrates busy Calif. farmers

FRESNO, Calif. — Farmers in the most prolific agricultural region in the country should be planting winter romaine lettuce and calculating spring cantaloupe acreage at this time of year.

Instead the romaine packing company left this year for the searing Sonoran Desert of Arizona, where there is more reliable water. And cantaloupe? Who knows whether there will be water to irrigate it.

"How bad does it have to get for people to take action?" farmer Jeremy Freitas asked a panel of state agricultural officials Wednesday, choking back tears.

They had come to California's agricultural heartland for an update on the state's water crisis. They left hearing that — even after a year of discussing possible quick fixes to the delivery problems that have fallowed tens of thousands of acres, forced bankruptcies and contributed to record unemployment — farmers are no more certain about their water supplies.

As California prepares for its fourth year of drought, farmers are nervous in California's San Joaquin Valley. The valley's eight counties, if they were their own state, would be the top producing one in the nation. Nearly all the U.S. cantaloupes, garlic, almonds and processing tomatoes come from here. And so do nearly 400 other commodities — more than anywhere else.

The lack of water in the state's reservoirs, coupled with the environmental collapse of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta where water from the state's wet north is pumped south to irrigate fields, has restricted the amount of water some of the state's most prolific farmers receive to as little as 10 percent of normal.

"It's October going to March quickly and we can't seem to get an agency to move," said farmer Dan Errotabere, who lost his romaine contract when the local packinghouse moved to Yuma. "We need action. We need agreements now. We need certainty in the Central Valley now."

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wants a special legislative session this fall to look at issues surrounding California's aging water infrastructure, built 50 years ago for a population one-third the size. The most ambitious, a peripheral canal to move water from the north around the Delta, is at least 15 years away.

Meanwhile, farmers have been begging for several quick fixes so they count on water in 2010, including temporary suspension of the Endangered Species Act so water can be pumped to them even if it kills threatened smelt. Congress once granted a temporary reprieve to New Mexico but so far has declined to do for California.

Also unresolved after a year of discussions: environmental issues related to transferring water from wet regions to dry ones; a clear sense of how much agriculture contributes to the environmental degradation killing smelt and salmon in the Delta compared to urban impacts; and a "two-gates" project that would block fish from the large pumps that transfer water from the Delta into delivery canals but would allow farmers water in the spring.

This year nearly 500,000 acres were left fallowed across the valley, half of that in the Westlands Water District, where farmers historically have created the state's highest yields of almonds, garlic and tomatoes with the most junior water rights. Several thousand acres of almonds and pomegranates died, though canals carrying water to Southern California passes by them.

Across the region farmworkers were idle, hardware stores suffered lost sales and tractor dealers didn't move John Deeres. Food banks turned away hungry families.

University researchers estimate $700 million in farm losses in 2009 alone, not counting taxes or the loss of value on farmland where water is no longer reliable.

"You think we had a tough year this year?" said Marvin Meyers, an almond grower on Fresno County's dry west side. "Wait 'til next year."

Farmers and the advisory board of the California Department of Agriculture said the state's $36 billion agriculture industry cannot afford another season of uncertainty. More packing houses they depend on to send their fruits, nuts and vegetables around the world will move to more reliable areas — across the border into Mexico they fear — if they cannot count on a reliable supply.

Another year of pumping salt-laden water from underground aquifers could kill their soil, they say. Board members warned that the Westlands Water District on the valley's west side is the first to be hit by the crisis, but the water problems are spreading to the state's other agricultural regions.

Some avocado growers in San Diego County are cutting trees back to stumps because the limited available water is too expensive.

"Where will the next shoe drop?" said board member Adan Ortega Jr.
Fukd
Posts: 542
Incept: 2009-10-07


Banned
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
grow the ****ing smelt in a pond
Sandor
Posts: 1944
Incept: 2007-08-08
Green
Deltaville,Virginia
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
This is no bull****. I drove through the valley last week and EVERYTHING is brown except for anything that has drip irrigation.

Looks like some are letting the grapevines die and choosing crops with higher values.

Being from the East, this sight was simply incredible.

Fitz22
Posts: 190
Incept: 2008-12-05

Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
It's not just the smelt. As I understand it, a main issue is that water rights were assigned more or less during wet years. So unless there is A LOT of precipitation, chunks don't get the water they request. Last I heard the water rights were so messed up that judges stopped paying attention to them and just settled things as best they could. Some lands are subsiding a lot, soils are very salty (needing flushing by a lot of un-salty water), soils are generally in poor condition anyway. The whole thing is a disaster.

It takes about 100 years for nature to produce an inch of topsoil.
Dbbeebs
Posts: 425
Incept: 2007-09-02

CA SF Bay
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Another part of the game plan is to abrogate water rights in Northern Ca and send this down to LA and San Diego. This is arnold's secret plan.

----------
"The stink of your lawless government has reached Heaven... Whether we live or whether we die, we will not bow to your evil commandments." -Vickie Weaver
Lemonaid
Posts: 9921
Incept: 2008-01-20
Green
Metro Detroit
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
You know, coconut palms can be grown with no fresh water at all. They can be grown using salt water only.

----------
"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved." Ludwig von Mises

Maple
Posts: 4785
Incept: 2007-09-03
Gold
Southern California
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
California legislators looking to hunker down on water bills
By Denis C. Theriault and Mike Taugher
Updated: 11/02/2009 06:03:03 PM PST

SACRAMENTO — Close to a final agreement on an issue that has long flummoxed lawmakers, the California Legislature was poised late Monday to finally take up the most sweeping overhaul of the state's aging water system in a generation.

But how that effort would fare remained unclear, as the Senate and Assembly convened for what was expected to be a long night of debate.

Partisan politics and regional squabbles once again were threatening to doom or delay an attempt at solving state's ongoing crisis, despite broad approval of the effort's primary goals: shoring up the fragile Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and creating a reliable water supply for the drought-starved southern part of the state.

Also threatening to derail talks was ongoing controversy over a multibillion-dollar bond bill that would build new dams, repair levees and finance the wide-ranging package of reforms — but also saddle the strapped state with hundreds of millions more in debt each year.

The shape of the policy reforms emerged late last month, after weeks of largely closed-door wrangling aimed at satisfying nearly ever water interest in the state.

Users would be asked to consume less water, with city and suburban residents asked to cut back by 20 percent by the end of 2020. Groundwater supplies across the state, for the first time, would be measured. And a special governing agency would be created to manage the Delta, a source of drinking water for two-thirds of Californians and for half of Silicon Valley.

One lingering controversy is whether the policy changes would pave the way for a canal that would route water south around the Delta.

Advocates have sought a canal for decades. Those calls have increased amid years of drought, especially after plummeting smelt and salmon populations led federal officials to reduce the amount of water pumped south from the Delta.

While the bills open the door for such a canal, they also make that path difficult. A canal would need to meet a high legal standard that would require it to actually lead to an environmental recovery in the Delta.

A lobbyist for the Westlands Water District, the state's largest irrigation district, said the district supports the legislation despite the high environmental hurdle.

"We're not certain we can meet that. We hope we can," Ed Manning, a lobbyist for the Westlands Water District in the San Joaquin Valley, testified last week.

Environmentalists are sharply split. Some are strongly opposed to a so-called peripheral canal and do not trust any guarantees that accompany it. Other environmental groups contend the bill is a good deal for the environment because of the high standard it must meet.

The policy bills, which would cover conservation, groundwater and new regulations, require only a majority vote to emerge from the Legislature. But the bond bill must receive two-thirds approval — the same tough threshold that typically tangles state budget talks every year.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has repeatedly insisted any water package include policy reforms as well as a bond, borrowed against the state's tax revenues.

If signed by the governor, the bond sale would likely go before voters next November. The bonds may face tough sledding, especially if organized labor or other interests mount a campaign urging voters to oppose it.

Already, opponents are seizing on Treasurer Bill Lockyer's warning that the portion of the general fund used to pay off debt could climb to a record 10 percent, possibly endangering already strained social programs.

Beyond concern over the size of the bond, some lawmakers were upset over how the bond money would be spent.

Republicans have insisted that the measure set aside $3 billion for new dams — and that the dams be permitted to proceed without legislative approval. Many critics contend it would be more fair to link dam funding to water fees, so farm districts and cities that benefit from the dams would pay for them.

Specifically, the bond bill's supporters want money for proposed dams that include Temperance Flat on the San Joaquin River, the Sites Reservoir off of Sacramento, and a proposed expansion of Los Vaqueros Reservoir owned by the Contra Costa Water District.

Generally speaking, the policy bill has more Democratic support, and the finance package has more Republican support. But as is usually the case with California water disputes, regional differences and other philosophical priorities can make a bigger difference than party affiliation.

http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news....
Bozonian
Posts: 19959
Incept: 2007-09-01
Green
Saratoga Springs, New York
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
smiley

Keep arranging those deck chairs on the Titanic.


----------
The most expensive thing you can have is a closed mind. -- Geoffrey Filburt

Everything I write is my opinion and not to be considered proven fact. Nothing I write should be considered financial advice.
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout