Personally I don't give a **** how homosexuals act out their mental problems as long as there are no children involved and the rest of us aren't forced to pretend it's either healthy or normal. Part of this particular mental problem is that so many are compelled to seek public justification and approval for disgusting behavior - they just aren't going to get it as long as men are free to hold their own opinions.

Today there are many serpents gnawing at the roots of the western tree.

No wonder the tree is dying and ready to fall.

Icanhasbailout wrote..

I will no more be forced to believe that one man can lovingly shove his dick up another man's ass and that's normal and OK than I will that, say, Social Security is in fine shape.

One of your examples can be objectively proven and the other one can not.

The solvency of Social Security isn't a matter of opinion - it's a matter of objective, provable, facts.

The morality of homosexuality will never be resolved because, unlike universal mathematical principals, the arguments for and against rest on issues of faith, belief and opinion.

The two sides will continue arguing from now until the end of time with neither side being able to prove the other side wrong because not everybody will agree on the standards of proof or evidence.

In the meantime you've just lost about 100 million potential allies on the issue of control fraud so you'll lose on that issue as well.

Divide and conquer succeeds and the banksters win.

Don't forget the pedophiles, no telling how many votes there.

If your house is burning down and the first firefighter to show up happens to be a pedophile do you put out the fire first and then deal with the pedophile or do you deal with the pedophile while your house burns?

Jimpad: get back in the closet.

Put the fire out with the pedophile

Quote:

Jimpad: get back in the closet.

Saul, that you?

The Rules of Engagement are bull****.

As usual... libertines are the first to hurl personal insults.

Yep, it's a sign of a culture in decline. The ability to discuss, think logically, formulate a thought, etc., is decaying. You see it all the time, when they can't logically support their position they simply come out swinging with the first thing that crosses their mind... curses, namecalling, insults, etc. We are sinking into barbarianism on all levels. The irony is they're like parasites, once they've devoured the host they're screwed too. Oh yeah, this will affect the fraudsters too.

Quote:

One of your examples can be objectively proven and the other one can not.

The solvency of Social Security isn't a matter of opinion - it's a matter of objective, provable, facts.

The morality of homosexuality will never be resolved because, unlike universal mathematical principals, the arguments for and against rest on issues of faith, belief and opinion.

The morality of homosexuality is as simple as understanding the fundamental purpose of sex in the first place - reproduction - and knowing that there is no combination in which males alone can combine to make that happen successfully. The truth of this is written in your very essence, if an otherwise intelligent person cannot see that his own biology establishes this as immutable fact (far more immutable than the insolvency of Social Security), then that is yet another symptom of people being fed lies so long that truth is unknown to them.

So far, the only people winning in this thread are the banksters who love love love endless, pointless, wedge-issue politics and promote it at every opportunity.

Or perhaps the strawman community, you've certainly erected enough of them.

I don't have time to argue about whether or not homosexuality is moral.

There are more important issues to argue about. For example, the fact that the Rules of Engagement are causing our troops to get shot.