Market Ticker Forums
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
Rss Icon RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Sponsored Advertising
To remove advertising from your display upgrade to Gold Donor status
MarketTicker Forums Read Message in Letters
User: Not logged on
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout
User Info Email from Sen. Evan Bayh in forum [Letters]
Goldbrick
Posts: 2946
Incept: 2008-01-23
Green
Indiana
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List Ignore this thread
March 12, 2009

Dear Friend,

You recently contacted me to voice your concerns about fiscal irresponsibility in Washington, D.C. I am writing you today to let you know that I have heard your concerns—and I share them.

Last September, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, our nation's top economic expert, told congressional leaders that if swift action was not taken to stabilize the banking system, millions of Americans would lose their jobs, life savings, and businesses. However, following the first release of federal funding for the Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Program (known as "TARP"), we saw many reported abuses by major financial institutions and a lack of transparency and accountability for how taxpayer dollars were being spent. As a result, I opposed the second round of funding for the TARP program.

The need for greater fiscal responsibility in Washington extends beyond the debate over how to unfreeze the credit markets. The Senate recently considered a $410 billion "omnibus" spending bill to fund the operations of the federal government for the rest of the fiscal year. I opposed this legislation because it called for substantial increases across an array of federal programs—more than twice the rate of inflation. If the federal government held spending steady, taxpayers would save an estimated $250 billion over the next 10 years. That is the right course of action.

The omnibus contained nearly eight billion dollars in pork-barrel projects, commonly known as earmarks. I voted to strip out every earmark from the bill. When that effort failed, I urged President Obama to veto the legislation.

Last week, I wrote an opinion column in the Wall Street Journal arguing for a return to fiscal sanity in the nation's capital. (To read, click here.) I wrote the article to send a message to Washington that runaway federal spending is the wrong prescription for America's economy in a deepening recession. As you can imagine, my vocal stance against earmarks and spending increases was not popular with many of my Senate colleagues, but I don't work for them—I work for you.

In these difficult times, I value your opinions and input more than ever. Washington needs a healthy dose of Hoosier frugality. Please keep your letters and emails coming. Together, we will weather this storm and get our economy moving again.

Sincerely,


---Link to WSJ piece: http://email.capitolhillnewsonline.com/m....

----------
"The higher I go, the crookeder it gets."
--Michael Corleone

"Instead of cursing the darkness, light a CONgressman."
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout