     |
|
|
|
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics
(The Year 2012 In Review) Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here. BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)  RSS available
You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
|
||
| MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context) |
User: Not logged on
|
| Top | Login | Control Panel | FAQ | Register | Logout |
| User Info | Federationist Site Reopened / Revised; entered at 2011-05-13 13:42:05 | |||
|
Tz Posts: 785 Registered: 2007-09-18 varies 
|
The right to move is absolute. Because we have decided on a system of roads instead of rails, it means automobiles. If the state thinks I am unable to properly exercise my right to move using a car, motorcycle, or truck, the burden should be ON THEM to prove it. Conversely, I should be responsible for anything that happens (they shouldn't mandate insurance either). If they can prove it to a jury, they can get an injunction against my driving (the same way if someone uses a gun irresponsibly can be banned from owning one). Note that acting negligently - DWI - or brandishing a gun - is enough to trigger an investigation, I don't have to hit or shoot and hit someone. That doesn't mean they are free to set low thresholds. Right now, if they think you are late with child support, you haven't paid some other levy, or for any of dozens of other whims TOTALLY UNRELATED TO DRIVING they can "suspend" your license. 2011-05-13 13:42:05
| |||