Market Ticker Forums
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
Rss Icon RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Sponsored Advertising
To remove advertising from your display upgrade to Gold Donor status
MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context)
User: Not logged on
Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout
User Info p20 - trying to connect the dots; entered at 2011-11-22 21:14:50
Maurevel
Posts: 473
Registered: 2009-06-14 Canada

Quote:


Take a balanced monetary system with no inflation (or deflation.) As soon as lending begins the persons doing the lending will seek to profit. As such they will charge an interest rate that reflects (1) time value of money, (2) the inflation rate (zero in this case) and (3) the risk of not being paid plus (4) a profit.

Time value is of course real, and this means that in aggregate the lending is "overpromised."


I am rarely the only one to not understand something, so pursuing...


I understand how lenders won't lend at a lesser rate than risk free securities, which I believe is the time value of money for a given term. But what drives the TVoM? Is it natural productivity gains?

As in -
Island uses stones as a currency.

On year 1, it produces 100 trouts, 1000 apples and 10 units of labour.
On year 2, it produces 102 trouts, 1020 apples and 10 units of labour.

Is the extra productivity gain what determines the time value of money?



And if so, then productive lending will simply accelerate that natural increase in productivity and lenders get paid in stones that buy more apples.


Last modified: 2011-11-22 21:18:43 by maurevel
Reason: expanded

2011-11-22 21:14:50