Market Ticker Forums
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
Rss Icon RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Sponsored Advertising
To remove advertising from your display upgrade to Gold Donor status
MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context)
User: Not logged on
Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout
User Info Tippy Tuesday!; entered at 2007-08-15 20:58:30
Sparohok
Posts: 9
Registered: 2007-08-14
Getting paid under the table also requires a conspiracy, between the employer and the employee, and it happens all the time. Why wouldn't you expect similar conspiracies between buyers and sellers? The 0.25% collection fee is hardly an incentive when there's 22.75% available to split between buyer and seller.

Sales involve a much larger number of transactions than income, and every transaction is an opportunity for fraud. How hard would it be for a landlord and renter to collude so as not to pay consumption taxes on rent? If the landlord already pays an illegal immigrant under the table to fix sinks and paint walls, he's no stranger to tax evasion.

FairTax might get rid of the IRS as it exists today, but there's still going to be a national agency to collect and enforce taxation. The "FairTax IRS" would be smaller than the current IRS, but it would be at least as large as the "H-R Flat Tax IRS".
2007-08-15 20:58:30