Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics
(The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
|MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context)||
User: Not logged on
|User Info||``Shocking revelations`` coming on Obama birth certificate; entered at 2012-05-31 21:58:26|
Registered: 2009-10-09 The Distant, Glorious, Past
"Parents is referenced, meaning two citizen parents are required to confer natural born citizenship."|
Clearly no one here understands that more recent rulings supercede older rulings until an appeal is heard to settle the matter.
That's how law works. It's X until someone rules Y at a later date and then an appeal is heard to settle X or Y or Z.
“Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”
regardless of the status of his father.
As I have written many times, you all selectively chose your support to justify your bias and you ignore more recent rulings that you simply do not like.
Your point of view is based upon bias, prejudice and irrationality.
Ignoring the more recent rulings for ones from 1874, or 1795, or 1790, or..., because you like and prefer the conclusion from 1874 more than the recent ruling, that's just illogical. It's also contrary to how law works.
You are biased, you then engage in logical fallacies and poor reasoning and debate form to seek justification for this bias, and this negates your arguments because of the poor logic therein.
I am 100% convinced that no matter what any court in the USA rules, you will still hold your biased and prejudiced opinions because you are right and the law is wrong.