Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics
(The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
|MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context)||
User: Not logged on
|User Info||``Shocking revelations`` coming on Obama birth certificate; entered at 2012-05-31 23:00:35|
Registered: 2010-06-25 Peoples' Republik of Maryland
Clearly no one here understands that more recent rulings supercede older rulings until an appeal is heard to settle the matter.
That is an arrogant statement, and demonstrably false.
As I have written many times, you all selectively chose your support to justify your bias and you ignore more recent rulings that you simply do not like.
Yet your view is correct, and you have no biases.
You are biased, you then engage in logical fallacies and poor reasoning and debate form to seek justification for this bias, and this negates your arguments because of the poor logic therein.
I'd really like to see you cite some case law instead of spewing a bunch of bull****. Seriously, I generally respect your posts and your opinions, but Pika-steph (and others) are owning you in this particular thread.