![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics
(The Year 2011 In Review) Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here. BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda) RSS available
|
||
| MarketTicker Forums Single Post Display (Show in context) |
User: Not logged on
|
| Top | Login | Control Panel | FAQ | Register | Logout |
| User Info | Pillars of deflationists' arguments disputed; entered at 2007-12-02 02:53:56 | |||
|
Agi Posts: 194 Registered: 2007-10-21
|
Pikachu wrote,Quote:
Ajas wrote, Quote:
Donja wrote, Quote:
Genesis wrote, Quote:
I've been wanting to call Peter Schiff's show again with a "devil's advocate" question, but have had trouble trying to determine the best one to ask. The quoted comments above might form the basis of a query. If his decoupling thesis is incorrect, his current strategy (get rid of dollars and hold select dividend paying foreign stocks, precious metals, and foreign currencies) would be suboptimal. So my question would be something like, Quote:
If any of you can think of a better, more detailed question or a different way to phrase it, please comment. (I intentionally left out the comments about our powerful US military, as I don't think I could keep a straight face due to the difficulty we've had subduing two 3rd rate countries (Afghanistan, Iraq). Sure we could start nuking other countries, but we're not the only nuclear power, and once nukes start flying I think the consequences would be too difficult to analyze). Nothing would stop one of the 'deflationists' from calling his show, and that might be better anyway as you probably could come up with a better follow-up question. The reason I like the idea of calling his show is that he has similar positions to Marc Faber, Jim Rogers, Jim Puplava, and others, but is more accessible. 2007-12-02 02:53:56
| |||