Market Ticker Forums
Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2012 In Review)
Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here.
BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda)
Rss Icon RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!
Sponsored Advertising
To remove advertising from your display upgrade to Gold Donor status
MarketTicker Forums Read Message in Realty
User: Not logged on
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout
Showing Page 2 of 2  First12Last
User Info Homebuyer Tax Credit: 950,000 out of 1.8 Million Must Repay in forum [Realty]
Sa
Posts: 1380
Incept: 2007-12-30
Green
California
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
HB, you may be one in ten million RE agents who is ethical. My experience is different. As a lender, I worked with some really knowledgeable, experienced, wonderful, caring realtors/agents. They all professed to take great care of their clients, and to look out for their best interest. Yet, they all wanted the borrower's pre-qual and pre-approvals to be at the absolute maximum possible, which frequently was above the purchase price/loan amount the customer wanted. The psychological pressure I frequently observed realtors/agents use to influence their clients into buying a property was staggering. That clients fell for the misinformation and hype is completely on the client, though, but I was disgusted by the dirty tricks played on them. As DTM said, even the people who most needed accurate advice refused to take it and got themselves into a heap of trouble. There were so many people getting their RE licenses in CA, and many of the real estate people I knew were arrogant know-it-alls. You can counter this with a million anecdotes about how wonderful RE agents are, but I have seen the other side and it has left me with a very negative opinion. The same can be said for lenders.
Halfbrite
Posts: 2459
Incept: 2008-10-13
Green
Arizona via California
Report This As A Bad Post Add To Your Ignored User List
Sa : I hear you. The business apparently changed (a lot) from 2004 when I retired, to 2010 when I unretired - actually, some of the vitriol that has been heaped upon Realtors is probably well deserved. I started in RE before the fax machine existed, and ethics, integrity, and personal relationships were perhaps a little more valued?

As far as agents wanting the max price on a prequal, here's why I always wanted the max prequal amount:

All clients are unrealistic to begin with, that's human nature, both buyers and sellers. There is a "gap" between expectations and reality, and your job as a pro is to move clients gently,lovingly, and professionally from unrealistic expectations into reality. If you start with a lower amount, it increases the gap between expectations and reality, and makes the job harder.

If someone wanted to spend less, I'd always show them the lower price range they asked for. After they turned their noses up at what was available, I'd suggest, "do you want to bump your price range up, or do you want to purchase one of the homes you just dissed?" - they would always bump their price range, but I had no problem with letting it be the clients decision to "bump up" ,not my decision. They always do, it's just a little more work.

----------
"That which cannot continue, will not continue. Brace for impact!"
Top Forum Top Login Control Panel FAQ Register Logout
Showing Page 2 of 2  First12Last