Goldman Sachs is going after Mike Morgan [General] - MarketTicker Forums


	Detailed market commentary at The Market Ticker and Ticker Classics (The Year 2012 In Review) Donations accepted; we offer GOLD ACCESS for enhanced privileges. T-Shirts, caps, coffee mugs? Click here. BlogTalkRadio - Mondays at 3:30 Central - Yes, TickerGuy has a radio show (kinda) RSS available You are not signed on; if you are a visitor please register for a free account!

Sponsored Advertising

To remove advertising from your display upgrade to Gold Donor status

MarketTicker Forums Read Message in General

User: Not logged on

User Info	Goldman Sachs is going after Mike Morgan in forum [General]
Omm Posts: 1635 Incept: 2007-08-29 NC	http://realestateandhousing2.blogspot.co.... Click the link to see the letter. I gave him all my Goldman stuff that I'd accumulated at another forum. Wednesday, April 8, 2009 Goldman Sachs v. Mike Morgan It looks like Goldman Sachs is not happy with the website I created to post information about Goldman Sachs www.GoldmanSachs666.com I received the letter below from their attorney today, and my Intellectual Property attorney will be responding accordingly. It's only been up about a week, and there is not much on there yet, but I invite everyone to submit articles and posts to the website relevant to Goldman Sachs. All posts will be reviewed, but unless they are clearly false or malicious, we will publish the truth. Feel free to visit the blog and leave your comments. You may also submit posts through the blog or our blog email address Mike@MikeMorgan.us Needless to say, we will most likely fight this one in court with Goldman Sachs and now we will expedite adding relevant content to this website. We have followed all of the legal requirements to own and maintain the website under the address we have selected. If you have any media contact you want to forward this to, be my guest. It's just another example of how a bully like Goldman Sachs tries to throw their weight around and this is a clear violation of our Constitutional Rights. ---------- "Don't whine because the Chinese won't play fair. They're communists." Xennady Jan 21, 2010. Last modified: 2009-04-09 10:20:04 by omm Reason: reset the link 2009-04-09 02:46:01 Permalink
Eaglewwit Posts: 6054 Incept: 2007-11-30 SoCal Banned	** Goldman Sachs, Pigs of all Pig*s. 2009-04-09 03:20:00 Permalink*
Antone Posts: 7663 Incept: 2008-02-03 Seditionia, USSA	Go Mike! It's hard deciding whether GS or JPM are the bigger pigmen. JPM seems to be sneakier about it, so I have to give the honor to them. But then there's the GS/Rothschild connection to consider. Tough one! But you want really really sneaky, you have to consider Bank of New York Mellon... ---------- As if anything has changed: Wir sind gefickt. 2009-04-09 03:31:38 Permalink
Provocateur Posts: 651 Incept: 2007-09-06 Melbourne, Australia	I think that he is over the top about Obama and that it's borderline detrimental to his credibility, but it takes some stones to go after GS. 2009-04-09 04:11:34 Permalink
Passivesf Posts: 5495 Incept: 2008-02-01	Good for him ---------- "Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power of currency should be taken from central banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs" 2009-04-09 10:26:24 Permalink
Fortune Posts: 1542 Incept: 2008-04-21 A deep dark place...scary	He should just change it to GoldmanSucks666.com ---------- It's a toss up. It is the Rule of Law that transforms assets into money: Martin Armstrong Math IS: Karl Denninger 2009-04-09 10:27:19 Permalink
Genesis Posts: 130744 Incept: 2007-06-26	"Goldmansachssucks.whatever" would be nearly-risk-free. I say this because "sucks" domains have been litigated REPEATEDLY and the registrant has won several times. This means there's case law and Morgan might be able to go after Goldman with a countersuit. ---------- I don't care* if it makes sense -- only if it makes money. -- Me* Bank (n): See scam, fraud and theft. *Eat a bankster -- they're low-carb.* *What part of "shall not be infringed" was unclear?* 2009-04-09 10:30:42 Permalink
Fortune Posts: 1542 Incept: 2008-04-21 A deep dark place...scary	Yup, Mike should jump on that idea before Goldman ties it up. Good suggestion and will save him some legal fees. ---------- It's a toss up. It is the Rule of Law that transforms assets into money: Martin Armstrong Math IS: Karl Denninger 2009-04-09 10:45:53 Permalink
Cash-out Posts: 2507 Incept: 2007-10-23 Live Free or Die - NH	he is a lawyer.. (I believe). ---------- More prepared than ready. 2009-04-09 11:16:10 Permalink
Bountyhunter Posts: 1274 Incept: 2007-12-05 Newport Beach, Ca Online	He's not going to win this one...so easy to use an alternate domain and take cover under the "sucks" angle. GoldmanSucks.com is for sale ---------- Our world is run by the MOB, ie the Banking Cartel. The number one recipient of commercial banking donations. Barack Obama. Nuf said. It�s enough to convict OJ with an ALL black jury. LCruiser 1/29/09 2009-04-09 11:27:02 Permalink
Genesis Posts: 130744 Incept: 2007-06-26	He MIGHT win it. But the cleaner "I hate you" domain is the "sucks" one. I've had a few of those registered from time to time when I wanted to really cornhole someone. Been threatened a few times, but nobody has been dumb enough to sue me over a "sucks" domain, and I'm not shy about pointing out the case law. ---------- I don't care* if it makes sense -- only if it makes money. -- Me* Bank (n): See scam, fraud and theft. *Eat a bankster -- they're low-carb.* *What part of "shall not be infringed" was unclear?* 2009-04-09 11:28:23 Permalink
Fidgit Posts: 17784 Incept: 2008-02-18 Tax Unit #1,384,923,781	Yay, Mike Morgan!! I luuuuv ankle-biters ;) 2009-04-09 12:08:58 Permalink
Ailujailuj Posts: 10631 Incept: 2007-08-22 NYC --->LA	wow... hope he's prepared for the wrath of the "sacks". ---------- "my god, the little bitch has gone to see the wizard." Last modified: 2009-04-09 12:48:11 by ailujailuj 2009-04-09 12:47:53 Permalink
Aja Posts: 2591 Incept: 2008-03-19	To me sounds as if their lawyers are trying to perpetuate their "usefulness" and get some fee. And I say that as a lawyer. 2009-04-09 12:50:48 Permalink