Landzen report?

Now i get to still believe the science was right, but that the input is prescisely the opposite of what I was told, reversing the final Answ?

Funny there has not been ANY talk of this in the MSM. I wonder what the ramifications of this are. I've been trying to find out more about it since I saw it down in Tin, now that it's a Ticker topic, it sounds more serious. Perhaps ALLOT more serious.

AGW theory has had the political objective of world government since its very inception. It's never ever been about science or saving the environment.

It's the most audacious power-grab in history.

The bank fraudsters are nickel-and-dime alley muggers in comparison.

Here's Monckton's entire speech:

Holy ****!?! This must get to Beck!!

Any proof that this isn't tin?

I have been amazed since Day 1 of this that they could get people to believe such crazy things about the weather... like everyone forgot the story of Chicken Little all at once.

Yesterdays Tin is today's reality. Genesis, be careful people might start accusing you of going all tinfoil. Next thing you know you will be doing the Alex Jones show. Just kidding.

Quote:

Any proof this isn't tin?

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/

On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel University in St. Paul, MN. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty, scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate to which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in-favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educating the public about the myth of global warming.

Does anyone have a link to the treaty? I (briefly) tried to find it and couldn't.

A stupid 700+ billion dollar stimulus shoved down our throats.
The confiscation of major industries and banks by our government and organized (crime) labor.
A health bill that 70% of Americans reject to be shoved up our asses with a Democrat controlled nuclear option bill.
An abominable "Cap & Trade" (massive energy tax) that will also be Rahm-rodded up our backsides and into our wallets.

And now... This Presidency is on the verge of squandering our very sovereignty to, of all places, the United Nations.

The only descriptive I can think of is CHANGE!

Is this good?

Any major media outlet mention this, it would be perfect fodder to get this on the Drudge Report?

See new post of a independent film to be livestream tonight:
http://tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-w....

Quote:

Does anyone have a link to the treaty? I (briefly) tried to find it and couldn't.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.c....

Obama does NOT HAVE AUTHORITY to sign away our constitution. I don't think his signature even matters. This would be like the President signing an executive order eliminating the office of President. The people of the United States are responsible to and only to the Constitution.

The sovereignty of the United States resides in the people and its constitution not in the person on the President.

He says that once the treaty is signed the US couldn't get out of it without the consent of everyone else and that wouldn't happen because the US would be the largest funder. What the hell are they going to do if the US just stops giving them money? UN sanctions? Stop funding them too.

MrGone in 3...2...1...

Quote:

And now... This Presidency is on the verge of squandering our very sovereignty to, of all places, the United Nations

Risking ridicule, I have to recommend TFrs read the "Left Behind" books. I've read the first two printed in 1995. These books describe a "born again", evangilistic view of the end-times rapture, and start with a sudden 'taking' of good people to heaven. If you can tolerate the supernatural beginning, the story then moves to what happens next.
I am a scientist, and trying to be rational, the only explanation I have is that the administration is following these New Testament stories like a script. For example, a major event is nuclcear disarmament followed by transfer of power to the UN, led of course by a charismatic. I am not religous like this book, it has me mesmerized about how closely current political actions follow the plot. Left Behind.

I would LOVE to see the rest of the world try to enforce it if the people of the USA say no.

I have a feeling the next ticker will acuse Obama of making a secret deal with space aliens. lol

Why couldn't a future President void such an agreement?

Quote:

Why couldn't a future President void such an agreement?

What future president isn't going to be part of the same octopus that put Obama in place?